2021-10-11 19:23
(2021-10-07 17:19)IfThisThenThat Wrote: @House056, you might just be the saddest of all sad fucks. You've now resorted to creating another account to bypass the ignore list. Now both ignored smh
I don't know if you're a debate lord who can't handle the L or just an autistic moron with many, many issues, but your argument is shattered before you even begin. You can't stop visiting these terrible models... the system clearly works. Also, your projection of why others visit (underage girls) is worrying and only a reflection of your thoughts. Especially when you can't stop visiting them! You have far less interest in Colombian models and when you turn up in a Russian model's chat (Kyle for example) you're the sweetest simp of all with such lovely comments.
It's a really creepy obsession you have there.
First, I haven't created any new (or otherwise second) account, either here or in CB, so again you are resorting to whole-cloth fabrication - that's really pathetic.
Second, I visit all kinds of models, pretty much across the board, and I don't see why that's an issue. Oh that's right, a standard line for non-nude lovers/defenders is to tell critics if they don't like it just leave.
Finally, perhaps the best example of the non-nude fixation on CB lately has been jesse_coy_. She's only been around for about two months, now has 88k followers, and has regularly been the top "non-nude" on the page most of that time. She also has a rating in the red but of 83%, which isn't that bad for non-nudes. But she has 186 down votes, which is an astounding number, perhaps the most on all of CB. What is even more astounding is that she's that popular, given that she isn't even very attractive and has the body of a 12-year-old boy (well, almost). But she does fall into that northern European dirty blond waifish runaway underage-looking category, right in the heart of it. Huh.
An update on the latest sensation, amy_haris, who right now has nearly 10k viewers in her room. Her rating has now dropped to 74%, 76 thumbs-up and 27 thumbs-down. The debate in her chat of course was all about the pros and cons of non-nudity. I mentioned that even if her thumbs-up ratings doubled she'd still be in the red, because she has so many down ratings, and the mod, wolf-something, said that it was all because of guys who want her to show her feet, which of course was an absolute fabrication, it's par for the course in general for non-nudes as I've shown. But non-nude mods of course want to defend non-nudity, they are part of the problem. And lying is what they have to resort to, as we see with you. As for amy, she will never see a rating in the green - unless she changes her play and starts showing the goods in a straightforward manner and at a reasonable price, that is. It doesn't take much on CB to be in the green, just play it straight and don't scam.
Oh, and amy is also a girl who has that pubescent look, which gets us back to the closet pederast-wanna-be aspect to non-nude fandom. That's not the whole game here at all, but it is a material part of it I'm sure, and again you can look to SWBM for leadership in that area, this has been their specialty with all their claimed 18-year-old hot flirts. And this is one of those cases where its obviousness makes anyone who strongly denies this very likely to be one themselves - look in the mirror lately, fella?
Anyway, that's a side issue, it doesn't really have that much to do with the scammy nature of so much of non-nudity, again that largely driven by some Russian studios, their playbooks and the girls they hire. And that is reflected in the ratings of these girls and the constant debate about non-nudity even in their chats. The title of this discussion says it all.