2021-01-23 17:23
- Options
- Login
- Register
- Desktop Style
Options
Theres a facial recognition site for camgirls.
- Theres a facial recognition site for camgirls.
2021-01-23 19:57
(2021-01-23 17:23)camgirlfinder Wrote:(2021-01-21 21:16)outbackjosiah Wrote: So no chance for older data (pictures)?
No sadly not.
But I have a good news, I just pushed an update which made the search ~20 seconds faster.
The average search should now only take 30s.
hi @camgirlfinder,
I have to admit, I'm impressed! Your system provides good results! Keep up the good work!
2021-01-23 21:28
Are you interested in adding older images as well?
For this you could try pulling in camvideos.me as a source.
For this you could try pulling in camvideos.me as a source.
2021-01-26 8:39
2021-01-26 16:05
After latest update to 1/24 data, results seem to be a lot less consistent. Even images that before were getting top match are not even getting right model to show up.
2021-01-26 21:10
(2021-01-26 16:05)Guest Wrote: After latest update to 1/24 data, results seem to be a lot less consistent. Even images that before were getting top match are not even getting right model to show up.
Can you send me the job ids? Then I could try to find out what is going on.
I noticed that since MFC switched to WebRTC their image preview servers deliver distorted images for all models that stream in 16:9 (which is the majority).
This is really annoying because I can not detect from the image alone what the correct aspect ratio is. For now I just resize all mfc images to 16:9 which in turn will distort 4:3 streams.
I am curious if they will fix this, for now they just resize the image via css in the browser
2021-01-26 21:33
(2021-01-26 21:10)camgirlfinder Wrote:(2021-01-26 16:05)Guest Wrote: After latest update to 1/24 data, results seem to be a lot less consistent. Even images that before were getting top match are not even getting right model to show up.
Can you send me the job ids? Then I could try to find out what is going on.
Okay I see what you mean, I uploaded the example image for Kati3kat and the new results are total garbage:
Example: https://camgirlfinder.net/jobs/Gx6Vs
New: https://camgirlfinder.net/jobs/HtptQ
Looks like I have to remove all images from January for mfc.
But maybe it is also something else because I would expect that SparkleTits still is the best match for that image. Since for that "account" no new images where added since 1st August 2020.
2021-01-26 23:39
2021-01-27 20:04
(2021-01-26 21:33)camgirlfinder Wrote: Okay I see what you mean, I uploaded the example image for Kati3kat and the new results are total garbage:
Example: https://camgirlfinder.net/jobs/Gx6Vs
New: https://camgirlfinder.net/jobs/HtptQ
Looks like I have to remove all images from January for mfc.
But maybe it is also something else because I would expect that SparkleTits still is the best match for that image. Since for that "account" no new images where added since 1st August 2020.
I found the problem, the last speedup introduced a bug that caused the result sorting to be wrong. Basically CB models always where on top.
It is fixed now.
2021-01-27 20:10
(2021-01-26 23:39)Guest Wrote: https://camgirlfinder.net/jobs/CUkBw
Result kind bad sad
Looks like you found a model that is simply not in the database.
Here is a run with the fix: https://camgirlfinder.net/jobs/LqcQY
If anybody knows the name for her please tell me.
I could search the database with that to be sure she is really not in it.
2021-01-27 22:00
(2021-01-27 20:10)camgirlfinder Wrote:(2021-01-26 23:39)Guest Wrote: https://camgirlfinder.net/jobs/CUkBwLooks like you found a model that is simply not in the database.
Result kind bad sad
Here is a run with the fix: https://camgirlfinder.net/jobs/LqcQY
If anybody knows the name for her please tell me.
I could search the database with that to be sure she is really not in it.
she is famous one asian model, she got dozen alternate id and bunch of videos around the net
https://www.camwhores.tv/search/ellaisbe...ahachinse/
2021-01-28 18:37
(2021-01-27 22:00)Guest Wrote: she is famous one asian model, she got dozen alternate id and bunch of videos around the net
https://www.camwhores.tv/search/ellaisbe...ahachinse/
Thanks for the names. There are only ~100 images of cutiechinese from MFC in the database (which are sadly all distorted).
According to the camwhores search all the other names are from years back, so it is not a surprise they are not in the database.
The result of LqcQY is exactly like I would expect it to be for a model that is not in the database.
Here is a search with a distorted image of cutiechinese: https://camgirlfinder.net/jobs/hSfvD
I am not even sure if it is the same model as in CUkBw & LqcQY.
2021-02-03 10:41
Thankyou for this site, this has improved very much over the last few weeks, great programming.
2021-02-03 15:39
Well done! It's a fantastic job. I was able to find a couple of models I used to follow some time ago 
Interface is simple, good and easy to use.
I've worked with face recognition once, and I can only imagine how large is your gallery. You talked about updating the database including new faces from last month. Does it work on an incremental way or do you retrain everything again? On my experience with face rec, updating the gallery frequently was a pain.
Another issue I had was regarding the image quality of query and gallery. Since the gallery was built with screencaps, I assume it's better if the query is also a screencap, instead of a profile picture from the model, correct?
As a suggestion, I assume there is a lot of people inputting new images now, searching their favorite models. How about using them as well? You could have feedback from the users about the accuracy of the predictions. Something like, from the 10 closest models of the query submitted there is a checkbox confirming the correct models. In this way you could have new labeled faces (and bonus stats regarding which models are most looked, which websites, etc).
Interface is simple, good and easy to use.
I've worked with face recognition once, and I can only imagine how large is your gallery. You talked about updating the database including new faces from last month. Does it work on an incremental way or do you retrain everything again? On my experience with face rec, updating the gallery frequently was a pain.
Another issue I had was regarding the image quality of query and gallery. Since the gallery was built with screencaps, I assume it's better if the query is also a screencap, instead of a profile picture from the model, correct?
As a suggestion, I assume there is a lot of people inputting new images now, searching their favorite models. How about using them as well? You could have feedback from the users about the accuracy of the predictions. Something like, from the 10 closest models of the query submitted there is a checkbox confirming the correct models. In this way you could have new labeled faces (and bonus stats regarding which models are most looked, which websites, etc).
2021-02-03 16:29
2021-02-03 17:16
(2021-02-03 15:39)metalmog Wrote: Well done! It's a fantastic job. I was able to find a couple of models I used to follow some time ago
Interface is simple, good and easy to use.
I've worked with face recognition once, and I can only imagine how large is your gallery. You talked about updating the database including new faces from last month. Does it work on an incremental way or do you retrain everything again? On my experience with face rec, updating the gallery frequently was a pain.
Another issue I had was regarding the image quality of query and gallery. Since the gallery was built with screencaps, I assume it's better if the query is also a screencap, instead of a profile picture from the model, correct?
As a suggestion, I assume there is a lot of people inputting new images now, searching their favorite models. How about using them as well? You could have feedback from the users about the accuracy of the predictions. Something like, from the 10 closest models of the query submitted there is a checkbox confirming the correct models. In this way you could have new labeled faces (and bonus stats regarding which models are most looked, which websites, etc).
Dude... I think you're really smart. QI 200
2021-02-03 21:02
(2021-02-03 10:41)thag Wrote: Thankyou for this site, this has improved very much over the last few weeks, great programming.
Thanks, but its still not as fast as I would like it to be
(2021-02-03 15:39)metalmog Wrote: I've worked with face recognition once, and I can only imagine how large is your gallery. You talked about updating the database including new faces from last month. Does it work on an incremental way or do you retrain everything again? On my experience with face rec, updating the gallery frequently was a pain.Yes it works incrementally because I do not use a neural network for the prediction. I ran exactly into this problem retraining would take too long.
I am sure there are ways around this, but I am also not an neural network expert.
For now the sites uses pretrained models for face detection and embedding/encoding. The prediction is then done by a nearest neighbor search.
(2021-02-03 15:39)metalmog Wrote: Another issue I had was regarding the image quality of query and gallery. Since the gallery was built with screencaps, I assume it's better if the query is also a screencap, instead of a profile picture from the model, correct?Yes the site will work better if one also uses screencaps as search image, because the face encodings will be more similar.
(2021-02-03 15:39)metalmog Wrote: As a suggestion, I assume there is a lot of people inputting new images now, searching their favorite models. How about using them as well? You could have feedback from the users about the accuracy of the predictions. Something like, from the 10 closest models of the query submitted there is a checkbox confirming the correct models. In this way you could have new labeled faces (and bonus stats regarding which models are most looked, which websites, etc).Since I do not use a neural network right now, there is less value in collecting user feedback. It would only be useful to detect if I screwed up something. Like a couple of days ago where only CB result where returned
Getting labeled training data is also not a problem.
Right now I download around 800k new images per day from the cam previews. At this point it is more about getting images from all models that exist, like new ones or models that are not online often. For all popular models I should have more then enough images.
2021-02-15 22:46
To anyone that still follows this thread
I managed to speed up the search by a factor of 3.
It now takes less than 10 seconds.
Have fun and please write me if you encounter inconsistent or weird behavior.
I managed to speed up the search by a factor of 3.
It now takes less than 10 seconds.
Have fun and please write me if you encounter inconsistent or weird behavior.
2021-02-16 0:26
(2021-02-15 22:46)camgirlfinder Wrote: To anyone that still follows this thread
I managed to speed up the search by a factor of 3.
It now takes less than 10 seconds.
Have fun and please write me if you encounter inconsistent or weird behavior.
Thank you for this great tool. I was wondering, regarding old stuff, would it be possible to use the extreme amount of content Camgirl Gallery has?
Example: http://thro.bz/image/3EucE
Lately it is acting up a bit. Like the home page doesn't work, you cannot search, etc. Still, the images are there and camgirlvideos.org and camvideos.me are practically living off the collection you can find here.
2021-02-16 21:12
(2021-02-16 0:26)dracus Wrote: Thank you for this great tool. I was wondering, regarding old stuff, would it be possible to use the extreme amount of content Camgirl Gallery has?
Example: http://thro.bz/image/3EucE
Lately it is acting up a bit. Like the home page doesn't work, you cannot search, etc. Still, the images are there and camgirlvideos.org and camvideos.me are practically living off the collection you can find here.
Yes it would be possible. But I don't think I have the time & resources to do so in the near future.
2021-02-17 7:19
great site. Is it possible that you can fix the mobile version of the site. Images only appear as little boxes. if that is possible, cool. Thanks for such a cool site.
2021-02-18 20:45
(2021-02-17 7:19)spike Wrote: great site. Is it possible that you can fix the mobile version of the site. Images only appear as little boxes. if that is possible, cool. Thanks for such a cool site.
You are probably using Safari, complain to Apple that they take so long to support useful web technologies
The site is using the WebP format for images, which helps to greatly reduce the size of the image database.
So no I can not fix this. Alternatively you can also use Firefox or Chrome on iOS.
Yesterday 8:05
How frequently is the model database updated?
Does the database gets older models as well when updated?
Does the database gets older models as well when updated?