2023-03-06 19:07
planning to put all of kateharrise exclusive here.
(2023-03-06 19:07)ask2k3 Wrote: planning to put all of kateharrise exclusive here.
(2023-04-02 16:04)nana1321 Wrote:(2023-04-02 15:30)ohnoyetanotherusername Wrote: Unfortunately in the studio with "no pussy on cam rule" (unless by accident but it's rare).
Isn’t there a chance that she starts showing more in her future broadcasts?
(2023-04-02 17:58)Justanotherguy Wrote:(2023-04-02 15:30)ohnoyetanotherusername Wrote: Unfortunately in the studio with "no pussy on cam rule" (unless by accident but it's rare).
Is that the same one that the Nancylamb, Beverlyvega, and Amandamedrano accounts belong to?
(2023-04-02 18:04)ohnoyetanotherusername Wrote:(2023-04-02 17:58)Justanotherguy Wrote:(2023-04-02 15:30)ohnoyetanotherusername Wrote: Unfortunately in the studio with "no pussy on cam rule" (unless by accident but it's rare).
Is that the same one that the Nancylamb, Beverlyvega, and Amandamedrano accounts belong to?
Yes, there are even some girls who have been on cam before late November in these acounts. These were probably all nude before and then like many, many others suddenly went strictly "all in panties". I have not heard about girls making exceptions since then.
(2023-05-13 11:25)Justanotherguy Wrote: Kateharrise Private Spy 2023 05 12 (no audio)
1st time I've seen her remove panties in a private (near the end @ about 34:20, no pussy) followed by a nearly 4-hour-long spy-disabled private. Can only speculate at what happened in there.
https://wolfstream.tv/u/65BWZ
(2023-05-13 13:13)ohnoyetanotherusername Wrote: Safest way to make sure a spy feature gets turned off for everyone (!) is by posting the caps in a public forum. Quite bizarre that you called her a scam for it already before.
(2023-05-13 16:30)Justanotherguy Wrote:(2023-05-13 13:13)ohnoyetanotherusername Wrote: Safest way to make sure a spy feature gets turned off for everyone (!) is by posting the caps in a public forum. Quite bizarre that you called her a scam for it already before.
Well that's an interesting perspective. I've seen caps of her posted from Stripchat. I see caps of her posted on CW. Also this is a forum meant for sharing as I recall. And, how am I scamming when I have actually paid for the privilege of spying? Unlike all the w*nkers who post public caps on CW as private, I have actually paid her, whether in tokens or via a monthly subscription.
Also, I called "her" out when she was in a spy-enabled private on CB but the feed was suddenly cut on the site that I was spying on, when I've paid for that privilege, as agreed upon in writing because it's listed, in writing, as a fan club perk. I've paid for something I'm being denied for no good reason, and you yourself agreed that it was a scam, or are you now changing your tune?
IF she is in an exclusive, spy-disabled private, as she was yesterday, I have no problem with that. What IS unethical/dishonest/a scam, is cutting the feed for no reason other than that her admin wants to drive people to the spy-enabled private on CB when I have every right to insist on having access to that private, because I have PAID for that privilege/right.
If her admin loses her the revenue generated from subscriptions because they have essentially ripped fan club members off, that's their doing.
(2023-05-14 7:49)total_recall Wrote: it is a dangerous game she is playing and at it again right now turning off stripchat when she is in private on chaturbate that will piss off all the guys that pay for her fan club membership on stripchat even if it only 10 bucks
we have all seen this picture before when a model starts to get greedy and begin scamming her regulars, won't be long before guys stop tipping towards her goals and her private shows drop off as most guys that pay for spying do it because they can't afford to pay for privates every stream but spying is a way to keep them engaged until they can afford the next private
(2023-05-13 16:30)Justanotherguy Wrote:(2023-05-13 13:13)ohnoyetanotherusername Wrote: Safest way to make sure a spy feature gets turned off for everyone (!) is by posting the caps in a public forum. Quite bizarre that you called her a scam for it already before.
Well that's an interesting perspective. I've seen caps of her posted from Stripchat. I see caps of her posted on CW. Also this is a forum meant for sharing as I recall. And, how am I scamming when I have actually paid for the privilege of spying? Unlike all the w*nkers who post public caps on CW as private, I have actually paid her, whether in tokens or via a monthly subscription.
Also, I called "her" out when she was in a spy-enabled private on CB but the feed was suddenly cut on the site that I was spying on, when I've paid for that privilege, as agreed upon in writing because it's listed, in writing, as a fan club perk. I've paid for something I'm being denied for no good reason, and you yourself agreed that it was a scam, or are you now changing your tune?
IF she is in an exclusive, spy-disabled private, as she was yesterday, I have no problem with that. What IS unethical/dishonest/a scam, is cutting the feed for no reason other than that her admin wants to drive people to the spy-enabled private on CB when I have every right to insist on having access to that private, because I have PAID for that privilege/right.
If her admin loses her the revenue generated from subscriptions because they have essentially ripped fan club members off, that's their doing.